A Guest Post by Rebecca Lily With the comeback of film over the last few years, many digital photographers are questioning whether or not to make the switch. This is a decision I had to ponder myself as well.
Your view on digital vs.
Should an artist specialize, or be skilled with both of them?? Wow, now that is a loaded question! One of my first attempts at using Photoshop to color a hand done sketch. I have a very unique point of view on this subject because digital art work began to boom when I was first going into College back in It was around that time that more people could afford home PCs so naturally more artists had access to programs like Photoshop.
I remember there was a lot of controversy surrounding digital art. Digital Artists argued that it was not a short cut, rather just another tool for making art, like a new kind of brush or paint.
Both sides made compelling arguments, and both arguments rang true with me when I was an 18 year old college freshman. Twenty years later, digital art is now considered a legitimate art form, but there are still strong opinions concerning Digital Art vs Traditional Tangible art.
So what do I think about it now after 20 years of digital art in the arts community? I like to end on a positive note, so I will start with the cons.
I think the prediction that digital tools would encourage young artists to skip learning the fundamentals of art has proven to be very true, unfortunately. There is A LOT of digital art work being produced these days. Some good… a lot, not so good. Artists are painting on the computer more than ever, so there is plenty of digital paintings to compare who has good fundamentals or not.
Their understanding of form and color translates digitally because of they can use the computer as a tool or extension of themselves, unlike those who are dependent on digital filters and effects. And that is tragic to me.
What is even more tragic than that is many artists seem to be fine with just learning enough so they can jump on a computer with no interest in exploring their artistic talents.
I mean, how can you not want to learn how to be a better artist? So in terms of artistic skill, I suppose one could say the digital era has set things back a little as artists have become more and more dependent on computers.
Each hero is drawn seperately, scanned, then arranged in photoshop. With all of that said, I think there has been an overwhelming amount of positives the digital era has brought to the art world.
Digital tools have proven to be an unlimited source of creativity with endless possibilities for artists of all kinds. A computer in the hands of a skilled artist can potentially be like Mozart in front a piano.
Many artists, like myself, have learned how to use both hand made art work and digital tools. I use photoshop to import my sketches and tinker with sketch compositions. It saves me countless hours from having to redraw and resize, and it put an end to physically cutting and pasting xerox copies of my sketches.
I use digital color sometimes, and have even created whole paintings on Adobe Illustrator. So the computer is a very important tool in my creative process, just as it is with millions of other artists.
Choosing one side or another in the Digital verses traditional media debate is being short sighted and an artist would be closing themselves off to artistic possabilities. I think artists should explore ALL forms of art, even if you try it only once you have enriched your artistic knowledge and experience, thus making you a better artist.
I like to think of being an artist like being a professional basketball player. They were great because they did everything great, and they became great at everything because they practiced and worked hard at mastering all aspects of the game. Like the great basketball players, I have worked hard at my skills in all aspects of creating art.
That is how I am able to create a painting, a drawing, a sculpture or a digital image without missing beat. So I would say you should specialize in being an artist. Learn it all and you will be able to create anything your mind can imagine.
How should the 21st Century artist become skilled?Digital and Film Radiography Comparison and Contrast Reference Handout Traditional Film Radiography must use more radiation to produce an image of similar contrast to digital methods. Digital Radiography that allows data to be displayed in a non standard manner.
After comparing and contrasting the product features, Essay about Digital Cameras using cameras. of consumer needs, so it is important to identify the different consumer segments. The research divided consumers of digital cameras in two groups: common users, professional users and amateurs, and analyzed the different needs of .
Traditional vs. Digital Arts 2. by Rafiq Elmansy; in Articles — 16 Jul, which put me in a real dilemma about comparing digital and traditional arts. These people’s opinions remind me of the old days when cameras were first invented and how people criticized it, refusing to admit it was a new field of art.
Essay on Traditional Markets and Digital Markets Why an Online Education Essay Material Management - Why Is Cycle Counting a Better Way to Audit Inventory Records Than an Annual Physical Inventory.
After comparing and contrasting the product features, Essay about Digital Cameras using cameras. of consumer needs, so it is important to identify the different consumer segments. The research divided consumers of digital cameras in two groups: common users, professional users and amateurs, and analyzed the different needs of these.
Twenty years later, digital art is now considered a legitimate art form, but there are still strong opinions concerning Digital Art vs Traditional Tangible art.
It’s interesting for me to look back and see how public opinion has changed, and how Digital tools have completely integrated themselves into the arts community.