Doctor of Philosophy Coursework element Research degree programme includes an element of coursework in the same or related fields. This provides a graduate-level foundation and prepares the student for research.
InSIAC received new cases from parties in 58 countries in 6 continents. The aggregate sum in dispute for all new case filings amounted to USD4. This will keep us firmly motivated to do better. My team and I would like to thank our partners and friends in the local and international legal and business communities for their continued faith in SIAC.
The panel discussed various potential issues that a lawyer or a party may face when commencing an arbitration, and offered their insights on Nus thesis submission status issues from an institutional perspective.
Members of the audience Left to Right: The workshop ended on a high note with the panel addressing further burning questions from the attendees on, inter alia, the consolidation mechanism under the SIAC Rules and appointments by SIAC in ad hoc arbitrations. To end the session, Mr Cooke expressed his gratitude to the panel from SIAC for taking their time to share their insights with the attendees.
This debate was a timely one, coming slightly less than two years after the arbitration community drew up the Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge, with signatories committing to diversify the pool of arbitrators and improve the profile and representation of women in arbitrations.
Mr Tan fired the opening salvo with the central thesis that women outperform men in personal qualities that were relevant to arbitral decision making — women tended to have more initiative and creativity, and displayed honesty and social awareness.
Citing various statistical studies as well as anecdotal evidence that women were smarter and live longerMr Tan presented a compelling case in favour of the participation of women on arbitral tribunals to improve decision making.
She argued that gender should make no difference to decision-making: Women arbitrators should be appointed on an equal opportunity basis, and not because of their gender. Ms Jae concluded that supporting the motion would harm, instead of support, women, by perpetuating gender stereotypes and suggesting that the participation of women in arbitral tribunals was no more than a form of tokenism.
Quite apart from the fact that women might have specific personal qualities and characteristics that lent themselves to the process of decision-making, the individual skills of a diverse group collectively contributed to greater group intelligence and translated to greater collaboration in making sense of evidence and submissions.
Gender diversity was a fact of the modern world, and the composition of tribunals should reflect this. The lyrics speak for themselves: At the end of this spirited debate, the audience spoke, and awarded the debate to Ms Barker and Ms Jae. What appeared at first to be a straightforward motion reflected the nature of the complex and multi-faceted debate on inclusivity in the community.
The women were still right on this score. With Mr Born present to weigh in on how the President and the SIAC Court dealt with some of the applications filed by parties under the SIAC Rulesincluding applications for emergency arbitration, Expedited Procedure, consolidation and joinder, and prima facie decisions on jurisdiction, participants were able to gain valuable insights on how to develop an effective case strategy in cases administered under the SIAC Rules.
In terms of procedure, Mr Born noted that the President and the SIAC Court would look to the Secretariat to brief them on the facts, procedural complexities and competing arguments for each case.
This briefing allowed the President and the Court Members to perform a detailed analysis of the merits of each application in complex cases where time was often of the essence. Unsurprisingly, one of the hottest topics raised by the audience related to various provisions in the SIAC Rules concerned with speed and costs, showing that this remained an important factor for parties.Can I track the thesis examination report status?
Yes, you can track your thesis exam report status via the Student Information System. Log into the system, go to Self Service > Student Center > Academics Section > View My Milestones dropdown list.
The QE comprises a comprehensive written examination and an oral defence of the Ph.D. thesis proposal. The comprehensive written examination tests the general competence of the candidate in his/her discipline(s), while the oral defence ensures that the candidate is prepared to embark on his/her thesis research.
Tell us your status and we. Screen Reader users press Enter to Limit by category. Limit by category This button does not work with screen readers.
Please use the previous link instead. Select a category. Submission of Photograph for Student Card. Undergraduate Students. Full-time undergraduate students are required to submit their photograph within two working days upon acceptance of NUS' offer of admission via the Online Photo Submission attheheels.comts are also required to access the system again two working days after submission to check whether the photograph has been approved for use.
The Netherlands (Dutch: Nederland [ˈneːdərlɑnt] (), West Frisian: Nederlân) is a country located mainly in Northwestern attheheels.comer with three island territories in the Caribbean (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba), it forms a constituent country of the Kingdom of the attheheels.com European portion of the Netherlands consists of twelve provinces and borders Germany to the east.
Complete the Application Fee Form and send it together with a crossed cheque made payable to “National University of Singapore”. Please write your name, mailing address and programme (Graduate Research Programme at NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering) applied for at the reverse side of the cheque; or.