The death penalty a humane punishment

There are some who believe that it is justified, and that anyone who dares to take a life deserves to have theirs taken as well. We, on the other hand, like to think of it as a relic of the past which can, and should, be replaced with better alternatives. There is simply no use for it in the 21st century, from both a monetary and humane point of view.

The death penalty a humane punishment

A total of people men and four women were put to death in California between December and April one man was hanged in this period and the rest executed by lethal gas. The death penalty was ruled unconstitutional in and there were no further executions in the state for 14 years.

Between andCalifornia had an average of 7. As the appeals process became longer and more complex, the number of executions per year fell and the murder rate climbed from 3.

The death penalty a humane punishment

Afterwhen executions ceased, the murder rate climbed rapidly to The murder rate continued to run at an average of California carried out its first post Furman execution on April 21, when Robert Alton Harris was gassed. A further eight men have been put to death up to the end of one more by lethal gas and seven by lethal injection.

They had spent an average of 16 years on death row. The effect of these executions was to see the murder rate fall back to 6. Based on California 's population increase from The current death row population is the largest in Americastanding at in May All these cases are bogged down in the appeals system and it is unlikely that a lot of them will ever be resolved within the natural life span of the prisoner.

Presently, the chance of being actually executed in California is effectively nil, whilst legal arguments continue over virtually irrelevant procedural matters that have nothing to do with justice or the guilt or innocence of individual prisoners.

However, the number of murders committed each year has fallen from a peak 4, in to 2, in Some 75, people have been the victims of willful homicide first or second degree murder between and in California.

It should also be noted that only those convicted of first degree murder with aggravating circumstances can be given the death penalty. These aggravating factors include such things as torturing, kidnapping, raping or robbing their victim. The concept of deterrence.

The death penalty a humane punishment

Are you deterred by the death penalty? Do you remember the last execution in your state? Do you believe that you would actually be executed if you were found guilty of murder in the first degree? These are a crucial questions for the deterrence argument.

A recent survey of a number of death row prisoners in several states showed that few of them actually gave much thought to what would happen to them and most did not expect to get caught in the first place. Do you believe that even if you were caught, convicted and sentenced to death that you would ever actually be put to death?

If so does this information have any effect on you? If you are not aware of executions in your state how can you be deterred by them?

I live in Kentucky which has 34 people on death row and has had just three executions since The last one, that of Marco Alan Chapman in November was consensual.

He had to go to court for the right to have his lawful and well deserved sentence carried out. But yet in the city of Louisville we had over 80 murders in It is unlikely that any of these will result in a death penalty and even less likely that they will result in an execution. What message does all this send?

Arguments against the death penalty. There are a number of incontrovertible arguments against the death penalty.Having witnessed a speedy and smoothly orchestrated execution by lethal injection, I am distressed when the death penalty is successfully carried out in a so-called “humane” fashion.

I am concerned about relentless efforts to make the administration of capital punishment streamlined, straightforward, and . The death penalty not only runs the risk of irrevocable error, it is also costly to the public purse as well as in social and psychological death penalty has not been proved to .

There Is No ‘Humane’ Execution This is what passes for progress in the application of the death penalty: Kenneth Biros, a convicted murderer, was put to death in Ohio last week with one drug, instead of the more common three-drug cocktail.

Death penalty controversy is nothing new in the United States. The debate over whether or not it is an effective means of justice or an inhumane ending to an individual’s life continues to rage.

The death penalty is not humane, and it is not meant to be. It's meant to be a deterrent to crime, whether or not it works, and a punishment. However, the death penalty has changed to try to be as humane as possible.

Jan 27,  · Many who oppose the death penalty, this page included, are obviously not interested in identifying more “humane” methods of execution; the idea itself is a contradiction in terms.

EDITORIAL: "There is No 'Humane' Execution" | Death Penalty Information Center